There are over 3.5 billion active smartphone users in the world. Each smartphone runs on a mobile processor developed with millions in R&D, be it a high-end or a budget SoC. There are many myths about smartphones that people believe easily without even thinking about it. Do you believe too that high RAM implies high speed? It doesn’t! Your phone’s speed depends on its processor. RAM only ensures that you can run multiple heavy programs simultaneously without running into any trouble. Generally, mid-range smartphones and processors grab most of the market share. The three most prominent budget processors in the current race are Snapdragon 768G
processor, Kirin 820,
and MediaTek Dimensity 820. In this article, we will do a comparison of Snapdragon 768G vs Kirin 820 vs Dimensity 820. We will also talk about Kirin 820 benchmarks and Snapdragon 768G benchmarks. Let’s get straight into the comparison.
Kirin 820 5G
Kirin 820 is a mid-range 5G-enabled processor. It holds both non-standalone and standalone designs with TDD/FDD full-frequency bands for a better experience. Also, it is equipped with the Huawei-designed Da Vinci NPU, which enhances the use of Artificial Intelligence by 73% with less power consumption. The Kirin 820 comes with great must-have features, like image noise cancellation, clear night photos, and more. Let’s know more about Snapdragon 768G processor.
Snapdragon 768G Processor
Qualcomm Snapdragon 768G features the 5th generation of Artificial Intelligence. The processor supports super-fast 5G connectivity, which boosts gaming enjoyment without lag and high latency issues. The processor renders graphic 15% faster than the Snapdragon 765. It gives the best-in-segment and smoothest experience.
MediaTek Dimensity 820
MediaTek Dimensity comes with premium ARM cores. It supports HyperEngine 2.0, which delivers the best gaming features to enhance the gaming experience. Moreover, Dimensity 820 comes with four Arm Cortex-A76 cores clocked at up to 2.6GHz and four Arm Cortex-A55 cores with up to 2GHz speed.
Snapdragon 768G vs Kirin 820 vs Dimensity 820
We have taken a quick look at all three processors. Now, it’s time to know more about the vital parts of the processors. We have divided this comparison into four different criteria – CPU, gaming performance (GPU), battery life, and memory. Let’s start with Snapdragon 768G vs Kirin 820 vs Dimensity 820 CPU comparison.
Starting with the Dimensity 820 CPU and clock speed, the cores which we get here can perform efficient multitasking operations. The first one is 4X ARM Cortex-A76 with a clock speed of 2.6GHz. The next core is 4X ARM Cortex-A55 clocked at up to 2GHz. Overall, the CPU performance is great because of 2.6GHz speed and 2 big cores.
Coming to the Snapdragon 768G, we got Tri-Cluster architecture, which means 3 different core sizes. The first core we get is 1X ARM Cortex-A76 with 2.8GHz speed and the second one is 1X ARM Cortex with 2.4GHz clock speed. The last core is 6X ARM Cortex-A55 with 1.8GHz clock speed. The first two cores are for multitasking, and the last one is for efficiency in tasks.
Lastly, Kirin 820 comes with a Tri-Cluster CPU too. The first core we get is 1X Cortex-A76 with 2.36GHz clock speed, then 3X Cortex-A76 with 2.22GHz clock speed, and 4X Cortex-A55 with 1.84GHz. Talking about the Snapdragon 768G vs Kirin 820 fabrication process, both sport 7nm of fabrication. Here, nm (nanometer) is the size of transistors. A smaller size implies that more transistors can be embedded in the CPU.
Coming over to the Snapdragon 768G vs Kirin 820 GPU part, we get Qualcomm Adreno 620 with 7nm of the fabrication process in 768G. Snapdragon 768G processor also gives users an elite gaming experience with its enhanced gaming graphics. Further, Kirin 820 supports 6-core Mali-G57 GPU with 7nm of fabrication. Less fabrication means better performance. With that, we also get Kirin Gaming+ 2.0, which supports an amazing gaming experience. If we compare Kirin 820 vs Dimensity 820 GPU, both processors are equally decent.
The Snapdragon 768G processor has improved a lot in terms of battery. The gaming experience of Snapdragon 768G is great at moderate graphics settings and saves from unnecessary battery drainage. According to the Snapdragon 768G benchmarks, it scored 98 in terms of battery efficiency. Additionally, in AnTuTu Benchmark v8, it scored 340,805.
Going ahead to the Kirin 820 benchmarks, it has a score of 91% battery efficiency and 370,733 scores in AnTuTu Benchmark v8. Lastly, Dimensity 820 gets a score of 87 in terms of battery efficiency. It’s AnTuTu Benchmark v8 score it as 407,892.
Snapdragon 768G supports dual channel LPDDR4X with 2133MHz speed. Furthermore, it features the support of EMMC 5.1, UFS 2.1, and UFS 3.0. Talking about Kirin 820 vs Dimensity 820, the former sports dual-channel LPDDR4X with 2133MHz speed. It also has EMMC 5.1, UFS 2.1, and UFS 3.0. On the other hand, Dimensity 820 has dual-channel LPDDR4X with 2133MHz speed. It features EMMC 5.1, UFS 2.1, and UFS 3.0.
Which Is The Most Powerful?
We have looked at each factor of all three processors. If we look at the CPU, GPU, and memory Kirin 820 is more powerful and enhanced and its Snapdragon & MediaTek counterparts. In terms of CPU, it has more cores. In addition, if we look at the GPU, Kirin 820 gives an amazing performance with its 6-core Mali-G57 GPU. Although battery efficiency is less than the Snapdragon 768G, still it is performing far better on other criteria. The close second in this race is the MediaTek 820 because of its upgraded cores and GPU performance.
That’s all for this article. Don’t forget to tell us which one you like among the Snapdragon 768G vs Kirin 820 vs Dimensity 820.
Stay Tuned With TECHBURNER For More Tech Stuff.